[aidden]

I think it would be beneficial to be able to view who received the errors so we can contact them for further information into the cause of the issue.

@Arbiter btw it wouldn't let me set the prefix as no prefix it said i had to select one :/

 

[arbiter]

Added suggestion as a prefix option for this section. The issue is that error reporting should be anonymous. If the user wants to volunteer that information they can do so in the textarea. I'll think on it.

 

[aidden]

Added suggestion as a prefix option for this section. The issue is that error reporting should be anonymous. If the user wants to volunteer that information they can do so in the textarea. I'll think on it.

Even if it was kept anonymous. options to contact anonymous user #1/2/3 etc. Because the majority of users don't actually leave a message and in some situations that makes it hard to evaluate what exactly was going on

 

[arbiter]

Even if it was kept anonymous. options to contact anonymous user #1/2/3 etc. Because the majority of users don't actually leave a message and in some situations that makes it hard to evaluate what exactly was going on

I think an unobfuscated stack trace would help with that just as much or more than the user wouldn't you agree?

 

[aidden]

I think an unobfuscated stack trace would help with that just as much or more than the user wouldn't you agree?

Yes and no. The main reason for this suggestion is that yes the stack gives us the line where it messed up but it doesn't give us the users setup and the state of the script at the time of the crash.