[hazard]

What would be the best way to detect whether or not the player is in combat?

@SlashnHax @Eagles13 @Aria @Aidden

 

[salvation]

1: check if local player health bar is showing, if not, return false
2: get all npcs
3: filter the npcs to only npcs that interact with the local player
4: filter the npcs based on attack options (if it cannot be attacked, it’s probably a follower)
5: return true if 1 or more npcs remain

 

[slashnhax]

What would be the best way to detect whether or not the player is in combat?

@SlashnHax @Eagles13 @Aria @Aidden

I use:
if player has target || player is targetted

 

[hazard]

How about Player#getTarget().getTarget() == Players.getLocal() ?

(Just a thought)

If the players' target's target is the player then they are in combat with eachother, right?

 

[eagles13]

How about Player#getTarget().getTarget() == Players.getLocal() ?

(Just a thought)

If the players' target's target is the player then they are in combat with eachother, right?

If the player isn't targeting anything, but something is targeting the player, this method will fail.

 

[salvation]

I use:
if player has target || player is targetted

I read this as: player is following another player, player is trading another player, player is trading an npc, player is banking, player has a pet cat

 

[slashnhax]

I read this as: player is following another player, player is trading another player, player is trading an npc, player is banking, player has a pet cat

the downfall of vague pseudocode aye

 

[ozzy]

I use a query to check if any attackable NPC's within a reasonable range have the local player as their target.