Question Teleports/Lodestone checks

Hey everyone! I did a quick forum search as well as a look through the jdocs and couldn't find exactly what I was looking for.

My question: if I am developing a bot that has a few teleports in it that use lodestones I was curious as to how I implement the bot to not spam click a lodestone if the user does not have access to said lodestone (ie lunar isle for example). I'm assuming there is some kind of check/return but I cant seem to find it anywhere.

maybe I'm looking right at it under lodestone in the jdocs, but I'm not sure

Any help would be appreciated!

btw I'm a noobie coder so I apologize that this is a bit menial

 

Code (Text):

1. @Override
2.     public void execute() {
3.         if (Lodestone.FREMENNIK_PROVINCE.isActivated()) {
4.             if (Lodestone.FREMENNIK_PROVINCE.teleport()) ;
5.             Execution.delayWhile(() -> (Players.getLocal().isMoving() || Players.getLocal().getAnimationId() != -1));
6.  
7.             } else {
8.             Environment.getBot().stop("The player doesn't have the correct Lodestone.");
9.         }
10.  
11.     }
12.  
13. }

Seeing as I haven't gotten a serious answer yet @Squidl would anyone care to let me know if this would work or not??

 

oops I didn't even see that, thanks! and what do you mean by "fucked up shit"? I just want it to simply check to make sure the user has access to the lodestone instead of spamming it if its locked

edit: do you mean because I was closing it without a body or in general?

--- Double Post Merged, May 23, 2018, Original Post Date: May 23, 2018 ---

Code (Text):

1.  
2. @Override
3.     public void execute() {
4.         if (Lodestone.FREMENNIK_PROVINCE.isActivated()) {
5.             if (Lodestone.FREMENNIK_PROVINCE.teleport())
6.             Execution.delayWhile(() -> (Players.getLocal().isMoving() || Players.getLocal().getAnimationId() != -1));
7.  
8.             } else {
9.             Environment.getBot().stop("The player doesn't have the correct Lodestone.");
10.         }
11.  
12.     }
13. }

new one (without the un needed ";" closing it too early

----------------------

Further edit: it works the way I thought it would! Thanks Derk for letting me know I missed something!