1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Resolved Bugged GameObject models @Wildy Agility

Discussion in 'Client & Site Support' started by SlashnHax, Jan 23, 2015.

  1. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    I was testing my Agility script bot's Wilderness course when I noticed that it likes to get stuck at the "Balancing log".
    Further investigation shows this, which prevents the script bot from interacting with the log:
    [​IMG]
    The "Stepping stone" is also bugged, but the bounds still allow the script bot to interact:
    [​IMG]

    Dev kit was not on low-CPU mode, and other the models of other objects were rendered properly.
    Both of these objects types are GroundDecoration, whereas everything else is primary. Not sure if it's relevant but I thought it was worth noting.

    @Cloud
     
  2. Cloud

    Cloud Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Does the dev toolkit show a model hash for these objects?
     
  3. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Yep.
    Log: -1351033801
    Stepping stone: -1351033801

    Both have Appearance: [17919] as well, and sizes 1x1
     
  4. Cloud

    Cloud Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    That means that's what's being shown is the actual model defined for that object's definition. Appearance is essential model ids.
     
  5. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    The models shown look a bit off though, don't they?
     
  6. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    The models shown look a bit off though, don't they?
     
  7. Cloud

    Cloud Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    I can't tell in regards to the first one, the second one looks like it's having some sort of issue with heights.
     
  8. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    The second one doesn't cover the real interactable bounds of the object, it's on the tile next to it. For now I'll set some forced bounds I guess.

    Is this something that can be fixed? Because the models shown don't match the object's model as well as they do with Primary Gameobjects at least :/
     
  9. Cloud

    Cloud Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    Can you show me a better image of the second obstacle then, its somewhat hard to see from that angle.
     
  10. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    I got that wrong sorry, the first one is off by a tile. (The Balancing log)
    The second one matches the tile and the "model" is drawn diagonally through the object, so it doesn't really affect interaction.
     
  11. Aidden

    Aidden Author of MaxiBots

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    6,482
    Likes Received:
    990
    @Cloud
     
  12. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    @Cloud this is still happening
    --- Double Post Merged, May 17, 2015, Original Post Date: Apr 28, 2015 ---
    @Cloud pls
     
  13. Cloud

    Cloud Engineer

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    1,124
    It looks like the thing that as happening at Heffin where fixing it would require a lot more calculations.
     
  14. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Any way that I could calculate the proper bounds once and then output the bounds so I can use them for forced bounds instead of playing around in a bounds editor?
     
  15. skrall

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    161
    Can't you write a short bot, that scans with the mouse to look for whether or not it can interact with the object? Like an CT scan reconstruction?
     
  16. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    That would work fine for a 2d space, but it'd change depending on camera angle and distance :/
     
  17. skrall

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    161
    Zoom out as far as possible, set the camera angle as close as possible to the ground, take a scan, rotate 90°, take another scan. Then logout and log back in and out till you are exactly above your character. Perform the scan again. This *should* be enough to create the 3-D shape, if the object is completely within your field of view, that is.
     
  18. SlashnHax

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,198
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    And then translating that area into a set game world points? Editing bounds is way easier than that xD
     
  19. skrall

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    161
    Haha yeah probably :D
    I'm just brainstorming along, trying to make some use of my education I had in physics :p
     

Share This Page

Loading...