[qosmiof2]

I think some of us (maybe not me but some sure did) prove their loyalty to this website.

The website has given me and probably everyone so much good i don’t think any of us wants to harm it. The community is amazing as well...

Or find someone you know personally so you can kill him if anything goes wrong.

Many developers and customers are not satisfied for waiting for too long.

 

[savior]

lol
btw i'm satisfied as fuck

 

[qosmiof2]

lol
btw i'm satisfied as fuck

I’m as well but a lot of people aren’t.

 

[wet rag]

@Arbiter

 

[qosmiof2]

@Arbiter

Ffs it’s a real issue.

We used to have 3 pushers.
Now we have 2 of which both are very busy.

 

[wet rag]

Ffs it’s a real issue.

We used to have 3 pushers.
Now we have 2 of which both are very busy.

Request - More Pushers

 

[qosmiof2]

Request - More Pushers

Well this sucks cylops dicks

 

[savior]

Ffs it’s a real issue.

We used to have 3 pushers.
Now we have 2 of which both are very busy.

And once we have new pushers, the existing 2 will stop entirely because there are new ones.
And after a few weeks the new pushers will settle for once every couple of days too, because pushing is an annoying unpaid job.
Face it, the way it is now is the only way this has ever went down, and will be going down.

 

[wet rag]

And once we have new pushers, the existing 2 will stop entirely because there are new ones.
And after a few weeks the new pushers will settle for once every couple of days too, because pushing is an annoying unpaid job.
Face it, the way it is now is the only way this has ever went down, and will be going down.

pretty much this sums it up

 

[qosmiof2]

And once we have new pushers, the existing 2 will stop entirely because there are new ones.
And after a few weeks the new pushers will settle for once every couple of days too, because pushing is an annoying unpaid job.
Face it, the way it is now is the only way this has ever went down, and will be going down.

It’s worth a try isn’t it?
Bugging those two very busy execs all the time is not very nice nor good for them.

Having someone who is online all the time wouldn’t be such a bad idea...

 

[awesome123man]

It’s worth a try isn’t it?
Bugging those two very busy execs all the time is not very nice nor good for them.

Having someone who is online all the time wouldn’t be such a bad idea...

Squidl for pusher

 

[savior]

It’s worth a try isn’t it?
Bugging those two very busy execs all the time is not very nice nor good for them.

Having someone who is online all the time wouldn’t be such a bad idea...

Be that as it may, arbiter still needs people he can personally trust to do the job right. It's absolutely crucial that not a single slip happens while pushing. So even if someone would be dedicated enough to constantly push updates, that doesn't automatically make him a good candidate.

 

[wet rag]

Squidl for pusher

$3 a push

 

[jhinn]

And once we have new pushers, the existing 2 will stop entirely because there are new ones.
And after a few weeks the new pushers will settle for once every couple of days too, because pushing is an annoying unpaid job.
Face it, the way it is now is the only way this has ever went down, and will be going down.

Let's say we get two more pushers, and the current pushers will start focusing on their own jobs (like API improvements or w/e), wouldn't that be a win/win? Not only do we have more people who are capable of pushing, but it also helps the current pushers focus on their own tasks, which means they can push updates (like API improvements) faster.

 

[wet rag]

Let's say we get two more pushers, and the current pushers will start focusing on their own jobs (like API improvements or w/e), wouldn't that be a win/win? Not only do we have more people who are capable of pushing, but it also helps the current pushers focus on their own tasks, which means they can push updates (like API improvements) faster.

Let's be realistic, they're already as busy as they are, why would they do API improvements all of a sudden because theres new pushers.

 

[qosmiof2]

Let's be realistic, they're already as busy as they are, why would they do API improvements all of a sudden because theres new pushers.

Dude seriously...
can you stop posting on this thread? Nothing good has come from your last few posts.

He meant they won’t have to spend their time dedicated for runemate for pushes.

 

[savior]

Dude seriously...
can you stop posting on this thread? Nothing good has come from your last few posts.

He meant they won’t have to spend their time dedicated for runemate for pushes.

Dude pushes aren't time consuming really, they are just a very tedious task... like cleaning your room

 

[auxi]

People should be testing their code better before pushing. I often see people requesting emergency pushes because they forgot to add a resource in their manifest, or there's a bug preventing a bot from functioning at all. I'm mostly referring to things that can be prevented by actually running your code for 5 minutes, so if you have a big project that is difficult to test all by yourself, I'm not targeting you.

 

[wet rag]

Dude seriously...
can you stop posting on this thread? Nothing good has come from your last few posts.

He meant they won’t have to spend their time dedicated for runemate for pushes.

But then they'll have to spend their time dedicated for runemate api because I'm just rebutting robin's post

 

[savior]

People should be testing their code better before pushing. I often see people requesting emergency pushes because they forgot to add a resource in their manifest, or there's a bug preventing a bot from functioning at all. I'm mostly referring to things that can be prevented by actually running your code for 5 minutes, so if you have a big project that is difficult to test all by yourself, I'm not targeting you.

Actually a solid point too