[sickness0666]

If we were to give authors 2 private slots for each open source bot they release, it could help increase the number of open source bots on the store. Which in turn could increase the number of new authors writing their own bots, because they have more source to look through

 

[aaron priest]

Is the amount of private bots restricted?
People rushing bots to gain access to more private slot wouldn't help anyone imo. I think the open source bots should come from people who really know how to work the api and are experienced in writing for RuneMate. Can't really find proper wording for it, but bad coding practice would carry on and on, if you understand where I'm coming from. If you wan't to show people how to do something, you should really know the ins and outs yourself, not just do it to gain some sort of reward.

 

[sickness0666]

You can have 1 private user per 1 public bot you have

 

[led]

That seems like a silly system. Why bother with private bots at all then.

 

[sickness0666]

That seems like a silly system. Why bother with private bots at all then.

Its to make you have to publish and maintain public bots. Its to help protect runemate also

 

[led]

Are the rules the same regarding authors++

 

[dark sage]

Are the rules the same regarding authors++

yes

 

[led]

I guess arbi never did like goldfarmers

 

[party]

Is the amount of private bots restricted?
People rushing bots to gain access to more private slot wouldn't help anyone imo. I think the open source bots should come from people who really know how to work the api and are experienced in writing for RuneMate. Can't really find proper wording for it, but bad coding practice would carry on and on, if you understand where I'm coming from. If you wan't to show people how to do something, you should really know the ins and outs yourself, not just do it to gain some sort of reward.

Thanks for saying it, so that I don't have to.