Implemented Restrict SDK Runtime for End Users

I give people a .zip file with both a jar and the source code. Wasn't aware I HAD to use the botstore and wait ~12 hours for them to receive the product when they could just as easily compile it themselves and run it.

 

No to mention waiting half a day is better than waking up and realizing your entire bot farm plus all your passwords to your email, paypal, etc are jacked because some kid put a generic rat in there and paid a kid a couple bucks to make it undetectable.

 

By putting a private bot on SDN.. does that mean the staff here review them before actual use of each update or does a system automatically check for viruses, rats, etc?

 

Yes.

 

Will scripts bots uploaded as private undergo the same quality checks or just safety checks.

 

RuneMate is not like pb We care about safety

#WYDFORMOD

 

Well this thread was entertaining. To be honest, I'm all for this change, safety is something that shouldn't be neglected xD

 

Took nearly 4 hours after I submitted my script bot to SVN to only receive a notification that the manifest tag is wrong. Guess it's time to wait another 5 hours just to allow a friend to use the script bot.

This is a pretty disheartening change, add a warning or something they have to agree to. If they end up being hacked, then you have no responsibility for it, they took the risk.

I hate how these Bot Client Platforms force you to do it their way, at this point i'm only using this client because I have no other choice. It's either EpicBot, TriBot which forces you to pay 5$ to simply load local scripts bots, or RuneMate. I wanted to eventually attempt a database setup with the scripts bots I create, like getting account info from a MySQL database and logging into the game using my own Login Handler and then sending info to the database as well, but I highly doubt that's going to be allowed on SVN, not to mention they're going to see my db logins, etc..

This is a stupid change IMHO, I get you want to protect your users, but some users don't want to be protected. Tired of being called this "anarchist" for saying so, create a warning, shit I don't care if you have a popup or some form you have to agree to, you shouldn't be held responsible if someone ignores the guideline or warning.

Revert this change, and find another way, please.

 

Congrats, you addressed 0% of my question.

 

But tbh here i have be doing the mod's job's helping

 

iirc, it's the same quality and safety checks as a public, free bot

 

Uhh, Did I get this right? You want to save RuneScape account names in your own database? That's just insecure, stupid and fishy. First off all, the client saves login details locally, because the simple fact is that the passwords need to be saved in plain textformat, because the JVM Keyboard can not handle encrypting and decrypting passwords without being unsecure (yes, you can write a keyboard that uses your custom encrypting, but if you do so, once again you are easily able to decrypt, because your script bot has to know the pattern.)

0/10 Hope you get banned for saying shit like this.

 

What an amazingly friendly community.

 

I think you can do this, as long as this system is for your own, private use, and not for any customer.

 

Atleast this is what @Arbiter told me on Skype a few days ago, when we were talking about the security checks performed to scripts bots. Arbiter can feel free to correct me?